Reflecting on January 6
A Call for Vigilance, Integrity, and Advocacy
January 6 has become a date etched in the collective memory of our nation—not just as a reminder of what was nearly lost, but of the work that remains to be done. On this anniversary, as another election is certified and the baton of political power prepares to shift, it’s imperative to examine the troubling patterns of hypocrisy that plague our democracy, regardless of which party claims victory.
For those on the Right, the most recent election results may be celebrated as vindication—a perceived correction of the wrongs they’ve spent years lamenting. The narrative will undoubtedly frame their success as justice served, despite the absence of any substantive evidence supporting such claims in prior contests. Meanwhile, some on the Left may contest these results—not through riots or physical insurrection perhaps, but in ways that echo the doubt and distrust they so vehemently condemned not long ago.
This political pendulum—swinging between righteous indignation and disgruntled self-righteousness—highlights a disheartening truth: neither side has escaped the trappings of hypocrisy. Both use the mechanisms of power to further their agendas while glossing over their own contradictions. But amidst this political theater, there are real and pressing concerns that transcend party lines.
Around the world, we bear witness to profound suffering: the ongoing genocide in Gaza, the relentless war in Ukraine, and the civil unrest in Sudan which has displaced millions, just to name a few. Here at home, we face crises that demand urgent attention—the housing shortage and homelessness epidemic continues to deepen, economic inequality widens, and marginalized communities brace for the potential harm of new policies under the incoming administration. These are not abstractions; they are lived realities for millions of people, while many privileged can turn blind eyes to.
Our responsibility, then, is clear: we must commit to uncovering hypocrisy and shedding light on corruption wherever it exists, no matter who is responsible. We must demand accountability and transparency, not just from those in office but from ourselves, to ensure we are not complicit in perpetuating the injustices we claim to oppose.
And yet, our vigilance cannot—must not—stop just at critique. The vulnerable—families struggling to keep roofs over their heads, communities targeted by systemic racism, those silenced by policies designed to diminish their agency—depend on all of us to stand in the gap. To advocate fiercely. To shield them from the harm so often exacted in the name of standard governance.
So to those who will govern, we say this: we wish you wisdom and integrity in your efforts to serve every citizen. But understand that we will not hesitate to stand in your way if your policies threaten the well-being of the communities we care for. The ultimate goal is not to obstruct but to protect—to uphold the promise of a democracy that serves all, not just the privileged or powerful.
On this solemn day, let us not only reflect but resolve. Resolve to confront the hypocrisy, demand justice, and advocate for those most at risk. As cliché as it may sound, Democracy still is not a spectator sport. It requires each of us to engage, to speak out, and to act. Only then can we honor the ideals upon which this nation was founded, and only then can we build a future worthy of them, together.
David Longoria's Article: A Disturbing Attempt to Exploit January 6
David Longoria’s article, *“Reflecting on January 6: A Call for Vigilance, Integrity, and Advocacy,”* is a textbook example of how opportunistic leftist ideologues weaponize tragedy to push their divisive agenda. Cloaked in hollow calls for "reflection" and "advocacy," Longoria shamelessly exploits the events of January 6 to further narratives of hate, racism, and political division, all while masking his real intentions under a facade of concern for democracy.
---
Exploiting January 6 to Sow Hatred
**A Platform for Division**
Rather than fostering genuine understanding or healing, Longoria uses January 6 as a pretext to vilify an entire segment of the population. His thinly veiled insinuations perpetuate the toxic narrative that millions of Americans who questioned election integrity are nothing more than dangerous extremists. By broad-brushing legitimate concerns as threats to democracy, Longoria not only dismisses dissent but stokes resentment and distrust between political factions.
**Hate Masquerading as Advocacy**
Longoria pretends to advocate for unity while subtly fueling animosity. His framing of January 6 paints conservatives as inherently corrupt and dangerous, completely ignoring the Left's role in escalating political tensions through unchecked violence during protests, inflammatory rhetoric, and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. This selective outrage is not advocacy—it’s a calculated effort to divide Americans further along ideological lines.
---
Racism Hidden in Plain Sight
**Demeaning the Marginalized**
Longoria’s repeated invocation of "marginalized communities" is a transparent attempt to manipulate racial and social tensions for political gain. Instead of offering real solutions, he reduces these communities to political pawns, exploiting their struggles to justify broader leftist policies that often fail to address root causes. This patronizing approach reinforces stereotypes rather than empowering those he claims to champion.
**Weaponizing Identity Politics**
Longoria leans heavily on identity politics, framing systemic issues as the fault of a specific group—primarily conservatives—while absolving the Left of any responsibility. This deliberate scapegoating only deepens racial divides and fosters resentment, making it harder for Americans of all backgrounds to find common ground.
---
Hypocrisy in Action
**Selective Accountability**
Longoria’s call for accountability and transparency is laughably one-sided. While he condemns perceived hypocrisy on the Right, he conveniently ignores the blatant double standards of the Left—such as their silence on violent protests in 2020 or their attempts to undermine democratic processes through court packing and gerrymandering. This isn’t a commitment to integrity; it’s a partisan attack disguised as moral high ground.
**Moral Grandstanding**
Longoria portrays himself as a defender of democracy, yet his article is riddled with the same fearmongering and moral superiority that he ostensibly critiques. By painting one side as irredeemable while excusing the other’s failures, he exposes his true aim: to shame, silence, and marginalize those who disagree with his worldview.
---
A Legacy of Leftist Destruction
**Ignoring the Real Crisis**
While Longoria waxes poetic about global conflicts and domestic issues, he conveniently sidesteps the catastrophic consequences of progressive policies in American cities. From rampant crime and homelessness to failing schools and rising inequality, these crises are direct results of leftist governance. Instead of addressing these failures, Longoria uses January 6 to deflect blame and distract from the Left’s inability to govern effectively.
**Undermining Democracy**
Far from protecting democracy, Longoria’s rhetoric undermines it by demonizing political opposition and normalizing censorship of dissenting voices. His article serves as a justification for authoritarian measures disguised as "advocacy," such as expanded surveillance, suppression of free speech, and policies designed to entrench leftist power.
---
Conclusion
David Longoria’s *“Reflecting on January 6”* is not a call for vigilance or unity—it’s a blatant attempt to exploit a national tragedy for personal and ideological gain. By weaponizing January 6 to promote hate, racism, and division, Longoria reveals himself as a partisan propagandist willing to sow discord to advance his agenda.
His hollow calls for integrity and advocacy are nothing more than smoke and mirrors, designed to deflect from the failures of the Left while vilifying the Right. Longoria’s rhetoric does nothing to heal the nation; instead, it deepens the wounds of division, ensuring that the hatred and distrust he claims to oppose will continue to fester.